Bilateral axillary web syndrome in a patient with primary lymphoedema of upper limbs and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Primary lymphoedema, axillary web syndrome (AWS) and yellow nail syndrome may be related. Mr B is a 66-year-old gentleman with genital lymphoedema and lymphoedema of all four extremities. In 2023, he was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and also underwent cardiac surgery. In November 2023, he completed an inpatient rehabilitation at the Földi clinic in Germany, where he received intensive treatment for his lymphoedema and was also diagnosed with bilateral AWS. The presence of AWS in a patient with primary lymphoedema and no history of axillary surgery is unique. Although AWS typically presents after axillary surgery, this case highlights that it can also occur in patients without lymph node surgery. While the precise cause of this presentation of AWS is not known, it may be connected to yellow nail syndrome or potentially the recent chemotherapy treatment. This article will describe the clinical case, highlighting the need for further research on AWS present in primary lymphoedema.

Diagnostic dilemma in maxillofacial pathologies: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck are a site of numerous pathologies with different aetiologies and presentations. Rare pathologies, although infrequent still do exist. Diagnostic dilemma in maxillofacial pathologies can be the most challenging situation. Dealing with uncertainty, although difficult, is a reality in surgical practice. Being thorough, attentive to details and clues, and maintaining an open mind are critical strategies in the approach to such a patient. CASE PRESENTATION: In our paper we are reporting a spectrum of 4 unusual variants of head and neck pathologies, whose age and sex were 52 years/ M, 37 years/F, 41 years/ F, 30 years/F respectively. All the patients were of Indian origin. The diagnosis ranged from autoimmune diseases to lymphatic cancer which posed a unique challenge both in the terms of diagnosis and management. CONCLUSION: A thorough systematic evaluation along with a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory in the diagnosis of unusual head and neck pathologies.

Genetic causes of lymphatic disorders: recent updates on the clinical and molecular aspects of lymphatic disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The lymphatic system facilitates several key functions that limit significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the impact and burden of lymphatic disorders, there are many remaining disorders whose genetic substrate remains unknown. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the genetic causes of lymphatic disorders, while reporting on newly proposed clinical classifications of lymphatic disease. RECENT FINDINGS: We reviewed several new mutations in genes that have been identified as potential causes of lymphatic disorders including: MDFIC, EPHB 4 , and ANGPT2. Furthermore, the traditional St. George's Classification system for primary lymphatic anomalies has been updated to reflect the use of genetic testing, both as a tool for the clinical identification of lymphatic disease and as a method through which new sub-classifications of lymphatic disorders have been established within this framework. Finally, we highlighted recent clinical studies that have explored the impact of therapies such as sirolimus, ketoprofen, and acebilustat on lymphatic disorders. SUMMARY: Despite a growing body of evidence, current literature demonstrates a persistent gap in the number of known genes responsible for lymphatic disease entities. Recent clinical classification tools have been introduced in order to integrate traditional symptom- and time-based diagnostic approaches with modern genetic classifications, as highlighted in the updated St. George's classification system. With the introduction of this novel approach, clinicians may be better equipped to recognize established disease and, potentially, to identify novel causal mutations. Further research is needed to identify additional genetic causes of disease and to optimize current clinical tools for diagnosis and treatment.

Comparing easywrap with six other adjustable wraps for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease by variation in pressure, stiffness and elasticity.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear guidance or comprehensive comparative evidence to help clinicians select between adjustable wraps for compression therapy. However, adjustable wraps could be compared with three metrics used for compression bandages: variation in pressure, stiffness and elasticity. AIMS: To determine whether easywrap (Haddenham Healthcare) had lower standard deviation (SD) in lying pressure, greater static stiffness index (SSI) and/or a greater mean elongation ratio than six other adjustable wraps. METHODS: In this preliminary exploratory study, seven adjustable wraps were tested in vivo 20 times each (140 tests in total), on 20 people (with a variable number of readings per participant), to give the SD in lying pressure and mean SSI. The same wraps were tested in vitro five times each to give the mean elongation ratio. FINDINGS: Of all seven adjustable wraps, easywrap had the second lowest SD in lying pressure at 5.9 mmHg, compared with 8.9 mmHg overall; the highest mean SSI at 13.2 mmHg, compared with 9.5 mmHg overall; and the highest mean elongation ratio at 137.0%, compared with 107.1% overall. CONCLUSIONS: These metrics suggest that easywrap has clinical advantages over other adjustable wraps. A lower variation in lying pressure suggests more consistent application of pressures within intended therapeutic levels. Higher SSI indicates greater resistance to stretching, which is linked to improved venous function and oedema reduction. Higher elongation ratio demonstrates greater tensile strength, which should maintain therapeutic pressure for longer without readjustment.

MR Lymphangiography in Lymphatic Disorders: Clinical Applications, Institutional Experience, and Practice Development.

Lymphatic flow and anatomy can be challenging to study, owing to variable lymphatic anatomy in patients with diverse primary or secondary lymphatic pathologic conditions and the fact that lymphatic imaging is rarely performed in healthy individuals. The primary components of the lymphatic system outside the head and neck are the peripheral, retroperitoneal, mesenteric, hepatic, and pulmonary lymphatic systems and the thoracic duct. Multiple techniques have been developed for imaging components of the lymphatic system over the past century, with trade-offs in spatial, temporal, and contrast resolution; invasiveness; exposure to ionizing radiation; and the ability to obtain information on dynamic lymphatic flow. More recently, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR lymphangiography (MRL) has emerged as a valuable tool for imaging both lymphatic flow and anatomy in a variety of congenital and acquired primary or secondary lymphatic disorders. The authors provide a brief overview of lymphatic physiology, anatomy, and imaging techniques. Next, an overview of DCE MRL and the development of an MRL practice and workflow in a hybrid interventional MRI suite incorporating cart-based in-room US is provided, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary collaboration. The spectrum of congenital and acquired lymphatic disorders encountered early in an MRL practice is provided, with emphasis on the diversity of imaging findings and how DCE MRL can aid in diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Methods such as DCE MRL for assessing the hepatic and mesenteric lymphatic systems and emerging technologies that may further expand DCE MRL use such as three-dimensional printing are introduced. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Surgical Management of Central Lymphatic Conduction Disorders: A Review.

AIM: Recent advances in lymphatic imaging allow understanding the pathophysiology of lymphatic central conduction disorders with great accuracy. This new imaging data is leading to a wide range of novel surgical interventions. We present here the state-of-the-art imaging technology and current spectrum of surgical procedures available for patients with these conditions. METHOD: Descriptive report of the newest lymphatic imaging technology and surgical procedures and retrospective review of outcome data. RESULTS: There are currently two high-resolution imaging modalities for the central lymphatic system: multi-access dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiogram (DCMRL) and central lymphangiography (CL). DCMRL is done by accessing percutaneously inguinal and mesenteric lymph nodes and periportal lymphatics vessels. DCMRL provides accurate anatomical and dynamic data on the progression, or lack thereof, of the lymphatic fluid throughout the central lymphatic system. CL is done by placing a catheter percutaneously in the thoracic duct (TD). Pleural effusions are managed by pleurectomy and intraoperative lymphatic glue embolization guided by CL. Anomalies of the TD are managed by TD-to-vein anastomosis and/or ligation of aberrant TD branches. Chylous ascites and organ-specific chylous leaks are managed by intraoperative glue embolization, surgical lymphocutaneous fistulas, and ligation of aberrant peripheral lymphatic channels, among several other procedures. CONCLUSION: The surgical management of lymphatic conduction disorders is a new growing field within pediatric general surgery. Pediatric surgeons should be familiar with the newest imaging modalities of the lymphatic system and with the surgical options available for patients with these complex surgical conditions to provide prompt treatment or referral. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Lymphoscintigraphy is frequently recommended but seldom used in a "real world setting".

OBJECTIVE: Lymphedema (LED) lacks a standard, simple, guiding noninvasive diagnostic test, unlike the two other circulatory disorders-arterial or venous disease. Lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) has been recommended by several guidelines as the diagnostic test of choice for LED. Several recent expert panels, however, have suggested from anecdotal experience that LSG was used infrequently, and that the diagnosis of LED is usually based on clinical examination. METHODS: To determine the use of LSG in a large real-world LED population, the International Business Machines MarketScan Research Database was examined from April 2012 to March 2020 for patients with a new diagnosis of LED (the index date). Use of LSG (LSG+) was ascertained during the period beginning 12 months prior to the initial coding of a LED diagnosis and ending 12 months after the index date based on the corresponding Current Procedural Terminology code; LSG use for sentinel node mapping at the time of oncologic surgery was excluded. Demographic profiles, comorbidities, and causes of LED among patients with and without evidence of LSG were characterized. RESULTS: We identified 57,674 patients, aged ≥18 years, who had a new diagnosis of LED and health care coverage for ≥12 months before and after this index date. Only a small number (1429; 2.5%) of these patients underwent LSG during the study period. The LSG + cohort was younger (53.7 vs 60.7 years), had a higher proportion of women (91.3% vs 73.4%), but a lower percentage of diabetes (12.8% vs 27.5%), heart failure (2.2% vs 8.7%), hypertension (32.4% vs 51.0%), and obesity (15.1% vs 22.2%) compared with the LED population who did not undergo LSG (all P < .001). Most importantly, the use of LSG for diagnosis varied with the etiology of LED (LSG was most frequently utilized among patients with melanoma-LED (9.5%) and patients with breast cancer-LED (6.7%), in contrast to patients with advanced venous disease-related LED (1.1%; P < .05 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Despite four guidelines recommending LSG, including the Guidelines of the American Venous Forum (Handbook of Venous and Lymphatic Disease-4th edition), which recommended LSG "for the initial evaluation of patients with LED" with a 1B recommendation, LSG plays a minor role in establishing the diagnosis of LED in the United States. This underlines the need for a better, simple diagnostic test for LED to complement clinical examination.

Comparing easywrap with six other adjustable wraps for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease by variation in pressure, stiffness and elasticity.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear guidance or comprehensive comparative evidence to help clinicians select between adjustable wraps for compression therapy. However, adjustable wraps could be compared with three metrics used for compression bandages: variation in pressure, stiffness and elasticity. AIMS: To determine whether easywrap (Haddenham Healthcare) had lower standard deviation (SD) in lying pressure, greater static stiffness index (SSI) and/or a greater mean elongation ratio than six other adjustable wraps. METHODS: In this preliminary exploratory study, seven adjustable wraps were tested in vivo 20 times each (140 tests in total), on 20 people (with a variable number of readings per participant), to give the SD in lying pressure and mean SSI. The same wraps were tested in vitro five times each to give the mean elongation ratio. FINDINGS: Of all seven adjustable wraps, easywrap had the second lowest SD in lying pressure at 5.9 mmHg, compared with 8.9 mmHg overall; the highest mean SSI at 13.2 mmHg, compared with 9.5 mmHg overall; and the highest mean elongation ratio at 137.0%, compared with 107.1% overall. CONCLUSIONS: These metrics suggest that easywrap has clinical advantages over other adjustable wraps. A lower variation in lying pressure suggests more consistent application of pressures within intended therapeutic levels. Higher SSI indicates greater resistance to stretching, which is linked to improved venous function and oedema reduction. Higher elongation ratio demonstrates greater tensile strength, which should maintain therapeutic pressure for longer without readjustment.

Overcoming lymphorrhoea: a step to achieve a better life with lymphoedema.

Lymphorrhoea-otherwise known as 'wet' or 'leaky' legs-is an increasingly common condition that many community nurses will encounter in their daily practice; however, until relatively recently, evidence-based literature on its management was limited, and treatment modalities only tackled the symptoms instead of addressing the cause. In this article, Francesca Ramadan highlights the devastating impact of this condition, and the resources available to community practitioners to assist their patients to live well with lymphoedema.

MyoD-family inhibitor proteins act as auxiliary subunits of Piezo channels.

Piezo channels are critical cellular sensors of mechanical forces. Despite their large size, ubiquitous expression, and irreplaceable roles in an ever-growing list of physiological processes, few Piezo channel-binding proteins have emerged. In this work, we found that MyoD (myoblast determination)-family inhibitor proteins (MDFIC and MDFI) are PIEZO1/2 interacting partners. These transcriptional regulators bind to PIEZO1/2 channels, regulating channel inactivation. Using single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy, we mapped the interaction site in MDFIC to a lipidated, C-terminal helix that inserts laterally into the PIEZO1 pore module. These Piezo-interacting proteins fit all the criteria for auxiliary subunits, contribute to explaining the vastly different gating kinetics of endogenous Piezo channels observed in many cell types, and elucidate mechanisms potentially involved in human lymphatic vascular disease.

Compression therapy in dermatology.

Compression therapy is a conservative therapy that can be used in many patients with dermatological conditions, especially those associated with edema. In addition to its well-established use in venous and lymphatic disorders, there is increasing evidence that compression therapy supports the healing of inflammatory dermatoses. The presence of edema, regardless of its etiology, is an indication for the use of compression therapy. Nowadays, a variety of materials and treatment options are available for compression therapy, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Often, compression therapy with low resting pressures is sufficient for effective therapy and is better tolerated by patients. The main contraindications to compression therapy are advanced peripheral arterial disease and decompensated heart failure. Individual factors and economic considerations should be taken into account when deciding on compression therapy with the patient. Patient self-management should be encouraged whenever possible. This requires education and support tools.

Inguinal intranodal lymphangiography reveals a high incidence of suprainguinal lymphatic disease in patients with leg edema undergoing stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have emphasized the important role lymphatics play in the drainage of interstitial fluid and edema prevention. Although the infrainguinal lymphatics have been studied in some depth, with patterns of pathology identified, such data above the groin are sparse, especially for patients with phlebolymphedema. The present study attempts to evaluate the status of lymphatic flow above the inguinal ligament in patients presenting with edema and undergoing stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO). METHODS: A total of 31 lower limbs that underwent pedal lymphoscintigraphy for leg edema and subsequent stenting for symptomatic CIVO formed the study cohort. Each limb underwent intranodal lymphangiography of an ipsilateral inferior inguinal lymph node (10 mL of lipiodol) at the time of stenting. Fluoroscopic visualization of lipiodol transit was performed at 20, 40, and 60 minutes and 3 hours after injection. Enumeration of the lymph nodes and lymphatic collector vessels from above the inguinal ligament to L1, visualization of the thoracic duct, the time delay to visualization of the thoracic duct, and pathologic changes to the thoracic duct when present were all evaluated. These anomalies were independently scored, with the scores combined to generate a total suprainguinal score (range, 0-3). This score was then compared to the limb's lymphoscintigraphically derived infrainguinal score (total infrainguinal score range, 0-3) using the t test and Spearman correlation. The clinical outcomes (grade of swelling, venous clinical severity score) after stenting were appraised. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients (31 limbs), 18 were women, with left laterality noted in 23 limbs. A nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion occurred in 9 limbs and post-thrombotic syndrome in 22 limbs. Of the 31 limbs, 24 (77%) had suprainguinal lymphatic disease (SLD), with 22 of the 24 limbs having severe SLD and 2, mild SLD. When SLD was compared with infrainguinal lymphatic disease, 6 limbs (19%) had the same degree of involvement above and below the groin (1 with normal and 5 with severe disease), 17 limbs (55%) had more severe SLD, and 8 limbs (26%) had more severe infrainguinal lymphatic disease. Three limbs with normal pedal lymphoscintigraphic findings had severe SLD. The Spearman correlation coefficient for the comparison of SLD and infrainguinal disease in the same limb was 0.1 (P = .69). At baseline, the limbs with severe SLD had the same degree of leg swelling and venous clinical severity score as the limbs with absent to mild SLD (P > .1) with similar improvements after stenting (P > .4). Seven limbs underwent complex decongestive therapy (all with severe SLD and concomitant severe infrainguinal disease in one) to treat significant residual leg edema, with improvement. CONCLUSIONS: SLD appears to be common in patients with leg edema undergoing stenting for symptomatic CIVO. Such disease appears to affect the thoracic duct more commonly. Although patients with persistent or residual leg edema after stenting can benefit from complex decongestive therapy, further workup in the form of inguinal intranodal lymphangiography and targeted intervention might need to be considered for those who do not benefit from such therapy. Further study is warranted.

Lymphography using microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) before lymphatic supermicrosurgery for severe lymphorrhea of lower extremity.

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an effective surgical treatment for lymphorrhea. However, the traditional indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent lymphography mapping for lymphatic vessels has limitations, it can only depict the initial capillary lymphatic network localized in the dermis of the skin, which cannot visualize lymphatics deeper than 1.5 cm. A new mapping technique, microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can address the problem. In one case of lymphocutaneous fistula, for the first time, we used microbubbles and CEUS technique for preoperative localization for LVAs. Microbubbles and CEUS can identify deep lymphatic vessels and better evaluate the function of lymphatic vessels. The patient's symptoms of edema and lymphorrhea improved clinically. Microbubbles and CEUS is an effective methods for identifying lymphatic vessels in lower limbs.

Protein@Cyanine-Based NIR-II Lymphography Enables the Supersensitive Visualization of Lymphedema and Tumor Lymphatic Metastasis.

Visualization of the lymphatic system is clinically indispensable for the diagnosis and/or treatment of lymphatic diseases. Although indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography becomes an alternate imaging modality compared to traditional lymphoscintigraphy, it is still far from ideal due to the insufficient detection depth and low spatiotemporal resolution. Herein, protein@cyanine probes are rationally developed to solve the limitations of the current near-infrared-I (NIR-I) lymphography. The protein@cyanine probes are synthesized following a chlorine-containing dye-labeling strategy based on structure-selectivity (facile covalent binding between the dye and protein with a 1:1 molar ratio). As expected, the probes display exceptional NIR-II imaging ability with much-improved imaging contrast/resolution and controllable pharmacokinetics, superior to the clinical ICG. The protein@cyanine probes locate lymph nodes and delineate lymphatic vessels with super-high sensitivity and signal-to-background ratio, enabling real-time diagnosing lymphatic diseases such as lymphedema and tumor lymphatic metastasis. In particular, the NIR-II lymphography provides an opportunity to discover the disparate morbidity rate of primary lymphedema in different types of mice. Given the fact of lacking clinically transferable NIR-II probes, this work not only provides a promising strategy for enriching of the current library of NIR-II probes, but also promotes the clinical translation of NIR-II lymphography technology.

Efficacy of octreotide to reduce lymphorrhea and prevent lymphocele after pelvic lymph node excision in gynecological malignancies.

AIM: To study the efficacy of octreotide to reduce lymphorrhea and prevent lymphocele after pelvic lymph node excision in gynecological malignancies. METHODS: Patients with more than 200 mL of lymph drained per day until postoperative day 3 after pelvic lymph node excision were enrolled. Of the 75 patients, 36 were managed by conservative methods without the injection of octreotide, and the other 39 patients were treated with the injection of octreotide. The treated group was injected with 0.1 mg octreotide q8h for 5 days, starting on postoperative day 3. The drainage tube was removed when the amount of drained lymph decreased to 100 mL per day. The age, BMI, operation time, removed lymph nodes, amount of lymph, duration of drain placement, proportion of patients with lymphocele and complications between these two group were compared. RESULTS: The total and mean daily amount of lymph produced per patient was significantly lower in the octreotide-treated group than in the untreated group. The duration of drain placement was shorter in the octreotide group than in the untreated group. The proportion of patients with lymphocele in the treatment group was lower than that in the untreated group. CONCLUSIONS: The injection of octreotide is effective to reduce lymphorrhea and prevent lymphocele after pelvic lymph node excision in gynecological malignancies.

Understanding the next circulation: lymphatics and what the future holds.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The lymphatic system was previously considered the forgotten circulation because of an absence of adequate options for imaging and intervention. However, recent advances over the last decade have improved management strategies for patients with lymphatic disease, including chylothorax, plastic bronchitis, ascites, and protein-losing enteropathy. RECENT FINDINGS: New imaging modalities have enabled detailed visualization of lymphatic vessels to allow for a better understanding of the cause of lymphatic dysfunction in a variety of patient subsets. This sparked the development of multiple transcatheter and surgery-based techniques tailored to each patient based on imaging findings. In addition, the new field of precision lymphology has added medical management options for patients with genetic syndromes, who have global lymphatic dysfunction and typically do not respond as well to the more standard lymphatic interventions. SUMMARY: Recent developments in lymphatic imaging have given insight into disease processes and changed the way patients are managed. Medical management has been enhanced and new procedures have given patients more options, leading to better long-term results.

Back to the Future II-A Comprehensive Update on the Rapidly Evolving Field of Lymphatic Imaging and Interventions.

ABSTRACT: Lymphatic imaging and interventional therapies of disorders affecting the lymphatic vascular system have evolved rapidly in recent years. Although x-ray lymphangiography had been all but replaced by the advent of cross-sectional imaging and the scientific focus shifted to lymph node imaging (eg, for detection of metastatic disease), interest in lymph vessel imaging was rekindled by the introduction of lymphatic interventional treatments in the late 1990s. Although x-ray lymphangiography is still the mainstay imaging technique to guide interventional procedures, several other, often less invasive, techniques have been developed more recently to evaluate the lymphatic vascular system and associated pathologies. Especially the introduction of magnetic resonance, and even more recently computed tomography, lymphangiography with water-soluble iodinated contrast agent has furthered our understanding of complex pathophysiological backgrounds of lymphatic diseases. This has led to an improvement of treatment approaches, especially of nontraumatic disorders caused by lymphatic flow abnormalities including plastic bronchitis, protein-losing enteropathy, and nontraumatic chylolymphatic leakages. The therapeutic armamentarium has also constantly grown and diversified in recent years with the introduction of more complex catheter-based and interstitial embolization techniques, lymph vessel stenting, lymphovenous anastomoses, as well as (targeted) medical treatment options. The aim of this article is to review the relevant spectrum of lymphatic disorders with currently available radiological imaging and interventional techniques, as well as the application of these methods in specific, individual clinical situations.

Outcomes and bioethical implications of lymphadenectomy in mastectomized patients: Importance and indication of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy / Resultados e implicaciones bioéticas de la linfadenectomía en pacientes mastectomizadas: Importancia y recomendación de biopsia por aspiración con aguja fina guiada por ecografía / Resultados e implicações bioéticas da linfadenectomia em pacientes mastectomizadas: Importância e recomendação da biópsia aspirativa com agulha fina guiada por ultrassom

Introduction: Lymph node involvement is the main prognostic factor in breast cancer. Mastectomized patients usually undergo lymphadenectomy (LA) of micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) despite the evidence of AMAROS trial to replace this therapy with radiotherapy in select cases. Objective: Demonstrate the ability of ultrasonography to detect non-metastatic or micrometastatic SLNs. Materials and methods: 132 patients who underwent mastectomy were evaluated. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was indicated for suspicious lymph nodes. LA and SNL biopsy (SLNB) were performed in patients with positive and negative FNAB, respectively. LA was performed in FNAB positive or SLNB positive cases, except in the presence of isolated tumor cells and micrometastatic SLNs. The tumor burden after LA in patients with negative FNAB and positive SLNB was measured; the presence of two or fewer positive SLNs was considered a low burden. Results: Sensitivity of FNAB for detecting positive lymph nodes in patients with a high tumor burden was 93% and specificity was 84%. Positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 60% and 79%, respectively. Conclusions: LA could have been avoided in 90% of mastectomized patients with negative FNAB and a low tumor burden who met the AMAROS criteria with a high NPV (79%).

Introducción: La afectación ganglionar es el principal factor pronóstico en cáncer de seno. Generalmente, pacientes mastectomizadas se somenten a linfadenectomia (LA) de ganglios linfáticos centinela micrometastásicos (GLCs), a pesar de la evidencia del ensayo AMAROS en ciertos casos para reemplazarla con radioterapia. Objetivo: Demostrar la importancia de la ecografía para detectar GLCs no metastásicos o micrometastásicos. Materiales y métodos: Se evaluaron132 pacientes sometidas a mastectomía. Se recomendó biopsia aspirativa con aguja fina (BAAF) por ultrasonido para ganglios linfáticos sospechosos. Se realizó Biopsia LA y biopsia de GLCs (BGLC) en pacientes con BAAF positiva y negativa, respectivamente. En casos positivos de BAAF o BGLC se ejecutó LA, excepto en presencia de células tumorales aisladas y GLCs. Se evaluó la carga tumoral posterior a LA en pacientes con BAAF negativa y BGLC positiva. La presencia de dos o menos GLC positivos se consideró carga baja. Resultados: La sensibilidad de BAAF para detectar nódulos linfáticos positivos en pacientes con alta carga tumoral fue del 93%; la especificidad fue del 79%. Valores predictivos positivo (60%) y negativo (79%). Conclusiones: Se podría haber evitado LA en 90% de pacientes mastectomizadas con BAAF negativa y baja carga tumoral que cumplían criterios AMAROS con alto VPN (79%).

Introdução: O comprometimento dos gânglios é o principal fator prognóstico no câncer de mama. Geralmente, pacientes mastectomizadas são submetidas a linfadenectomia (LA) de gânglios linfáticos sentinelas de micrometástases (GLSs), apesar da evidência do estudo AMAROS em certos casos para substituí-la por radioterapia. Objetivo: Demonstrar a importância da ultrassonografia na detecção de GLSs não metastáticos ou micrometástase. Materiais e métodos: Foram avaliadas 132 pacientes submetidas à mastectomia. A biópsia aspirativa com agulha fina (BAAF) ultrassônica foi recomendada para gânglios linfáticos suspeitos. A biópsia LA e a biópsia do GLSs (BGLS) foram realizadas em pacientes com BAAF positivo e negativo, respectivamente. Nos casos positivos de BAAF ou BGLS, a LA foi realizada, exceto na presença de células tumorais isoladas e GLSs. A carga tumoral após a LA foi avaliada em pacientes com BAAF negativa e BGLS positiva. A presença de dois ou menos GLS positivos foi considerada carga baixa. Resultados: A sensibilidade do BAAF para detectar linfonodos positivos em pacientes com alta carga tumoral foi de 93%; a especificidade foi de 79%. Valores preditivos positivos (60%) e negativos (79%). Conclusões: a LA poderia ter sido evitada em 90% das pacientes mastectomizadas com BAAF negativa e baixa carga tumoral que preencheram os critérios AMAROS com alto VPN (79%).

Characterization and treatment of thoracic duct obstruction in patients with lymphatic flow disorders.

PURPOSE: The contribution of thoracic duct obstruction to lymphatic flow disorders has not been well-characterized. We describe imaging findings, interventions, and outcomes in patients with suspected duct obstruction by imaging or a lympho-venous pressure gradient (LVPG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical, imaging, and interventional data, including the LVPG, of patients with flow disorders and imaging features of duct obstruction who underwent lymphatic intervention were retrospectively reviewed, collated, and analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eleven patients were found to have obstruction, median age 10.4 years (interquartile range: 8-14.9 years). Pleural effusions were seen in 8/11 (72%), ascites in 8/11 (72%), both in 5/11 (45%), and protein-losing enteropathy in 5 (45%). Eight patients (72%) had congenital heart disease. The most common site of obstruction was at the duct outlet in 7/11 patients (64%). Obstruction was secondary to extrinsic compression or ligation 4 patients (36%). Nine patients (82%) underwent interventions, with balloon dilation in 7/9 (78%), massive lymphatic malformation drainage and sclerotherapy in 1, and lympho-venous anastomosis in 1. There was resolution of symptoms in 7/9 (78% who underwent intervention, with worsening in 1 patient and no change in 1. In these patients, preprocedure mean LVPG was 7.9 ± 5.7 mmHg and postprocedure gradient was 1.6 ± 1.9 mmHg (p = 0.014). Five patients in this series underwent intervention solely to alleviate duct obstruction and in 4/5 (80%) this led to resolution of symptoms (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Duct obstruction may be seen in lymphatic flow disorders and can occur from intrinsic and extrinsic causes. Stenosis at the outlet was most common. Obstruction can be demonstrated by an elevated LVPG, and interventions to alleviate the obstruction can be beneficial.